Las Cruces Police Chief Jeremy Story, center, appeared last week in this video with Ryan Ellison, the acting U.S. attorney for New Mexico, and Justin Garris, the FBI special agent in charge of our state.
Las Cruces Police Chief Jeremy Story, center, appeared last week in this video with Ryan Ellison, the acting U.S. attorney for New Mexico (left), and Justin Garris, the FBI special agent in charge of our state (right). (Video screenshot)
Listen to this article

Las Cruces Police Chief Jeremy Story has given a hell of a gift to the Trump Administration.

The headline from the national right-wing news outlet Blaze News proves the point: “Police chief’s viral video demands action against man accused of dozens of crimes — and Trump admin responds,” it states.

This tale begins on Oct. 28, when Story appeared in a video the Las Cruces Police Department shared on social media. The chief spoke about Neal Garcia, a man who had been arrested more than 70 times over the past three years but was still on the streets because state judges deemed him incompetent to stand trial.

Garcia’s alleged crimes included several incidents where he punched store employees who confronted him with shoplifting, in addition to breaking windows at City Hall.

“I would argue that he posts a clear danger to the public and community,” Story said in that video.

As intended, Story’s message fanned flames. The video went viral.

Federal intervention

Fast-forward a little more than two weeks, and Story posted a second video on Nov. 13. He appeared in it alongside federal law enforcement officials to announce that the feds had taken the unusual step of intervening to get Garcia off the streets.

Story stood in a dimly lit room with a stern look on his face and his hands perched on a podium. He introduced Ryan Ellison, the acting U.S. attorney for New Mexico, and Justin Garris, the FBI special agent in charge of our state.

Court records reveal that the feds charged Garcia under a statute intended to combat racketeering. The justification is that items he shoplifted were made in other places and shipped to New Mexico.

Garcia’s arrest, Story said in the video, is “a prime example of what can be accomplished when law enforcement at all levels works together to protect our community.”

Garris agreed. And Ellison shared an ominous message. “To every law enforcement agency and prosecutor across New Mexico: the U.S. Attorney’s Office is open for business,” he said. “If you have violent, repeat offenders who continue to victimize your communities, contact our office or the FBI.”

Many are praising Story for finding a creative solution to a problem our state has failed to address on its own.

I agree that Garcia shouldn’t be on the streets. But I want to caution against cheerleading an effort that turned the focus of right-wing media and the Trump Administration on Las Cruces — attention that could expand to other parts of New Mexico.

State is working to combat crime

Our state is working to improve systems that lets folks like Garcia roam free. Thanks in part to Story’s lobbying, the N.M. Legislature made substantial reforms earlier this year.

Karl Reifsteck, director of the state’s Administrative Office of the Courts, faced tough questions at a legislative hearing on Tuesday about what the judicial branch is doing to ensure folks aren’t freed without also getting the help they need.

While crime is down in Las Cruces, there’s clearly more to do. For residents of cities like Las Cruces and Albuquerque, this is an urgent issue. But it’s work for the state, not the feds.

Authoritarians control our federal government. They are using their power to bend local and state governments and citizens to their will.

That includes engaging in a violent, brutal mass deportation campaign that targets communities and people like ours. Federal agents have been approaching people in Charlotte, N.C. in recent days to inquire about their citizenship simply because of their skin color.

It isn’t just immigrants who are at risk. It’s all of us. And it should make us all uncomfortable that federal agents are policing local crimes like shoplifting. That would scare the hell out of Thomas Jefferson.

Playing with fire

Story’s media campaign was designed to get attention, and it did. According to Blaze News’ article, the chief confirmed that federal intervention came in response to his first video.

That video supports President Donald Trump’s false narrative that the streets in a city governed primarily by Democrats are lawless. His second video shows the Trump Administration coming to the rescue, which is the point Blaze News amplified with its headline.

Optics matter, and it’s important that Story’s second video portrays several white men holding a brown man accountable. That will feed the white nationalist wing of the MAGA movement. The Blaze News article juxtaposes Garcia’s booking mugshot with Story’s smiling face.

Attention begets attention. Story, a Republican, is playing with fire. By attracting the Trump Administration’s focus with such tactics, he invites an increased federal presence in our city. That undercuts the direction set by the Las Cruces City Council.

According to the Blaze News article, Story thanked the news organization “for covering this important topic.”

The federal charges

Garcia is charged with violating a federal law called the Hobbs Act, which makes it a crime when someone “obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion…” He faces up to 20 years in prison and will remain jailed until his trial.

Local crimes like those Garcia is accused of are usually state matters, not issues for the federal government.

What justifies federal involvement? According to the criminal complaint filed in federal court, Garcia shoplifted from stores in Las Cruces where the majority of goods are manufactured and shipped from places outside New Mexico, so his attempted theft impacts interstate commerce.

That’s an interesting use of the Hobbs Act. Enacted in 1946 “to combat racketeering in labor-management disputes,” the U.S. Department of Justice’s website states, the statute is now often used “in connection with cases involving public corruption, commercial disputes, and corruption directed at members of labor unions.”

While Garcia’s case is an expansion of federal reach, it’s not without precedent. A document prepared for the U.S. Sentencing Commission details use of the statute to prosecute:

• “…the robbery of $538 from an Ohio pizza restaurant because it purchased flour from Minnesota, pizza sauce from California, and cheese from Wisconsin.”

• “…five robberies involving small sums of money because the victims sold goods originating from outside Tennessee.”

• and “…three robberies involving approximately $50,000 because one of the victims, an Ohio check-cashing business, drew checks on banks operating across the country.”

Apples and oranges

Story may be comfortable inviting the feds to police local crimes like these, but I am not — not in normal times, and especially not when Trump has federal agents disappearing people, sending immigrants to another country to be raped and tortured, using baseless arrests to intimidate protesters and journalists, and assaulting immigrants, protesters and others.

Federal law enforcement agencies regularly partner with local police on issues like narcotics trafficking, child pornography and human trafficking. That makes sense, at least in normal times. Agency cooperation helps solve those crimes, and there’s natural overlap. Local police on the front lines often discover federal crimes.

Story used that fact to defend federal involvement in Garcia’s case during Monday’s meeting of the Las Cruces City Council.

“Historically we have worked with federal agencies like FBI, ATF, DEA for crimes within our community,” he said. “…That tool is something we have always used and we need to use to keep Las Cruces safe.”

But the comparison is apples and oranges when we’re talking about using a federal racketeering statute to incarcerate a shoplifter — and especially when the chief engaged in a viral media campaign, rather than making a phone call, to convince the feds to intervene.

Second strike

Does Story think the feds were eager to help out of the goodness of their hearts? With all their free time? Article after article documents all the crimes Trump has diverted federal agents from investigating, like child pornography and public corruption, to increase the focus on deportations.

There’s a reason federal officials made time to charge and arrest Garcia. It isn’t a good one, but it’s one Story designed.

Story might be a top-notch police officer, but that’s no excuse to act this way. While I reject the assertion that all cops are bad, I’ve written that policing in the United States is a flawed profession that needs serious reform. Story is proving my point.

And this isn’t his first strike. When Las Crucens gathered months ago to protest masked, federal law enforcement agents disappearing people, LCPD snipers watched them through scoped rifles from nearby vantage points, including the city library.

No one from the police department — not Story or any of his officers — bothered to walk across the street from the police station to communicate to the protesters that the snipers meant them no harm.

That alone speaks volumes. Regardless of intent, LCPD intimidated protesters that day. Story acknowledged that failure and promised his department would be better in the future.

And yet, here we are again.

Out of line

The choices Story has made to get a dangerous man off the streets are also dangerous.

And he’s defying direction from the city’s leaders. Councilors recently approved one of the most forward-thinking, assertive resolutions to protect immigrants in the United States.

“I think the values of Las Cruces are really clear,” Councilor Becky Corran said in October when the Council approved that resolution. “…This is a place where we can do something. We can fight back against cruelty.”

In short, Story is way out of line.

Again, few would argue that Garcia belongs on the streets. But how he’s dealt with matters.

State policymakers are listening to Story. He needs to keep working with them to improve our systems. Our city’s drop in crime is due in no small part to the proactive work of Story and his officers.

‘We need to draw a line’

The chief needs to practice patience and tenacity. And he must stop undercutting the city’s efforts to protect residents from the Trump Administration. Local activist Lucas Herndon said it well during public input at Monday’s City Council meeting.

“We need to draw a line,” said Herndon, who attended the protest LCPD snipers watched through rifle scopes earlier this year.

“We need to demand that police chiefs answer to their elected officials — not to federal task forces or shadowy agencies that operate without transparency,” Herndon said. “We need to restore local control, reinstate civilian oversight, and ensure that every municipal dollar be spent toward improving the lives of our communities, not further militarizing them.”

“Because when police power creeps beyond the law, it doesn’t just erode trust — it erodes democracy,” he said. “And we can’t afford to let that happen.”

Inflaming right-wing anger doesn’t make Las Crucens safer. Using that energy to convince an administration that is disappearing people to turn its attention on Las Cruces doesn’t make us safer.

City councilors need to get their police chief under control.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Kim Stewart

People should be careful about playing politics when they don’t fully have a grasp of it. Be careful what you ask for. I don’t want federal help beyond that which we have always had here

Bob Libby

This person who has been arrested numerous times needed to be off the street. Maybe the police chief used the wrong tactic, but the result warranted it.

Michael L Hays

The “wrong tactic” is invariably an assault on constitutional rights. The ends do not justify the means, which are these principles.

Ken Hacker

The chief had a difficult situation on his hands. His options were very limited. I hope that he lobbies for a new mental hospital to be constructed in Las Cruces. The governor has the funds to build one. That way, those deemed incompetent to stand trial can be taken off the streets and given needed treatment. Food and housing are inadequate solutions to local crime. Jobs and serious in-patient rehabilitation are also needed.

Kenneth Hacker

You are very welcome, Heather.

Wally Haussamen

It seems that the New Mexico court system has failed both Mr. Garcia and the citizens of Las Cruces. Chief Storys’ solution of Federal intervention is specious and the FBIs’ use of a federal statute not intended for enforcing local shoplifting crimes is at best fallacious, inaccurate, and probably fraudulent. If Mr. Garcia is incompetent to stand trial then his behavior elevates beyond a law enforcement and criminal justice problem. It is not clear through this reporting that any court ordered a mental health evaluation or that he was ever offered voluntary or court ordered involuntary mental health treatment according to New Mexico Statutes Chapter 43, Article 1. There seems to be a legal process for dealing with individuals like Mr. Garcia that was not used.

Michael L Hays

Among other absurdities of this case is the use of the Hobbs Act. If someone assaults another in New Mexico with a baseball bat, he or she might be liable for federal not local or state prosecution because the bat was made in Kentucky.

This unnecessary linkage of local police with federal law enforcement, especially under the Trump administration, is very dangerous. The state legislature, not federal law enforcement agencies, is the proper place to deal with the difficulties presented by repeat offenders who are ascertained to be incompetent to stand trial. Chief Story, in his resort to federal resources, is a threat to long-term public safety in Las Cruces.

Karen Milliorn

This case is illustrative of multiple problems we face here in New Mexico, but the slippery slope of using a similar tactic against undocumented immigrants is far, far down the list & your gratuitous involvement of the president is a farther reach.
We have had a very longstanding shortage of inpatient psychiatric treatment beds—stretching back well over 30 or 40 years—as well as a concomitant shortage of psychiatric physicians (along with the state’s ongoing & worsening shortage of physicians of all kinds) that directly affects this case & deserves emphasis here, rather than attempting to append it as just another example of government/law enforcement overreach. That someone should have been brought up for multiple (“alleged”) assaults & for being what sounds like a clear threat to the community, but with no recourse but to return him to the street—even though he was not only incompetent to stand trial, but also incapable of navigating in society safely—simply boggles the mind, yet you choose to criticize what appears to have been the only reasonable solution, given our current lack of resources.
In the last several years, we have lost at least one law enforcement officer who was fatally stabbed by someone who sounded not dissimilar to Mr. Garcia. How, then do we protect the community, in the face of such a lack of options? And even then, if we had the inpatient beds, psychiatrists, & outpatient clinic spots, how would we endeavor to avoid his relapsing if he decided to quit an effective treatment? The move to shut down inpatient facilities in the 1970’s-80’s was a double-edged sword that freed too many folks from hospitalization & effective treatment, but basically condemned them to homelessness.
You see, there are many more ramifications to this case that are closer to the core problem of protecting the community & getting appropriate care for those with serious mental health problems, without going out onto the limb of what I know is one of your main interests (immigration issues).

Karen Milliorn

The major issue here is not just the repeated release of a potentially dangerous individual, but the serious lack of appropriate care for individuals with mental health issues that is a combination of lack of facilities & lack of physicians. The result is lives wasted—not the lives of folks who might be injured by the mentally ill but the lives of the mentally ill, who deserve a chance at a better life. My emphasis was intended to be on the lack of available resources for care for such individuals—NOT on the need to have a means to remove them as a threat. I’m sorry if that was unclear.

Back To Top