
Recent tweets from the Trump Administration have been unapologetically racist and coded with white supremacist language while celebrating mass deportation.
Those of you who are still supporting this fascist purge will be remembered in our history books as a stain on our nation. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
“Defend your culture!” That’s what an Aug. 5 tweet from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security screamed in asking people to take jobs rounding up immigrants.
A few weeks earlier, a July 23 tweet from Homeland Security made clear exactly what the Trump Administration means when it calls for people to defend their culture. It posted an image of the painting “American Progress” by John Gast.
The painting celebrates manifest destiny and shows white Americans chasing down indigenous people. Painted in 1872, it came at a time when the U.S. Army was forcibly removing the last resisting indigenous people from their ancestral lands across the West and killing many of them.
In other words, it’s a celebration of one of the most racist chapters in U.S. history.
As MSNBC opinion columnist Zeeshan Aleem wrote, “The agency is promoting the idea that America’s most authentic heritage can be traced back to its history of ethnic cleansing, racist social hierarchies and racial domination.”
Literal Neo-Nazis
The Homeland Security tweet about the painting states, “A Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending.” It matches the energy extremist Ann Coulter brought last month when she tweeted that the United States “didn’t kill enough Indians.”
Twitter’s artificial intelligence, Grok, was asked if it’s coincidence that Homeland Security’s Tweet contains 14 words, which is code for two slogans that rally white supremacists, and includes the letter “H” twice, capitalized both times, as in “Heil Hitler.”
Grok had this to say: “DHS has denied similar past accusations as coincidences, but the precision here makes pure chance unlikely — I’d estimate under 30% probability. Scrutiny is warranted.”
In case you’re wondering, the two racist slogans, when combined, state: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children… because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the Earth.”
Then on Monday, Homeland Security tweeted, “Which way, America man?” It was an apparent reference to the 1978 book “Which way, Western Man?” The book was written by white nationalist William Gayley Simpson. Here’s a quote from the book:
“Let me preface what I am about to say by declaring frankly that I am prepared to accept violence on the part of our people. The Jews’ hold on our throat is not going to be relaxed until we break their grip. Hitler felt that he had to take to the streets. All normal approach to his people was barred. Today, we are confronted with much the same situation here.”
These are literally Neo-Nazis. If you support what they’re doing, what does that make you?
‘Unapologetically’ white colonizers
It isn’t realistic to expect history to meet our moral standards, Aleem wrote. But, he wrote, “so much of the iconography of the right entails looking backward at American history and finding nothing to object to.”
That’s because the Trump Administration aims to reinstate an overtly racist society. If you scroll through Homeland Security’s Twitter feed, you’ll find lots of photos of white people as the good guys and almost exclusively brown and black people as the bad guys.
You’ll also see additional historical paintings. When the Washington Post published an article about artists and their families being unhappy with their work being used in such a context, Homeland Security tweeted back at the newspaper:
“This administration is unapologetically proud of American history and American heritage. Get used to it.”
I had hoped some Republicans in this state — like former Bernalillo County Sheriff Darren White, who is running for mayor of Albuquerque — would be on the right side of history in this moment. But White, like so many others, has instead aligned himself with the racist authoritarians.
I know Republicans in the N.M. Legislature who have the capacity to be better than this. But they aren’t, at least not publicly.
Preying on men who feel marginalized
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, the racist architect of all of this, knows how to get people to do what he wants.
“It’s your turn to be the main character,” he tweeted on Aug. 3 in recruiting people to work for Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
He’s speaking to white men who feel marginalized. He’s offering a mission to folks like the internet trolls who are bombing Star Wars TV show ratings on Rotten Tomatoes because those shows are led by people of color. When you visit ICE’s hiring website, you’re asked to “choose your mission.”
Miller wants to return to the days when white people held all the main roles on television and in real life, when people of color were the throwaway characters who died first.
This is undeniably a rough time for boys and men in the United States, especially white ones. In response, the Trump Administration is manipulating people like self-proclaimed incels into leaning into racism and fascism.
While we do need to address this crisis, empowering our men to be lawless, racist thugs is not the way.
You’re being recruited to chase down grandpas and gardeners, to separate children from their parents, to send people who fled persecution back to their deaths.
All because you can’t find a job? Or can’t get laid? That’s why Miller thinks he can get you to do his bidding. He’s preying on you.
It’s pathetic. Don’t fall for it.
A better way
My culture, New Mexico’s culture, is multi-racial. It has fluid borders in part because, historically, the flow of the river changed from year to year.
Our culture celebrates the white people who live and work here, of course — but others too, including the indigenous folks who were here before the rest of us and the Spaniards who lived here before the United States existed.
We salute the immigrants who have come to our state throughout our history and continue to come from every corner of the world because of our agriculture, universities, military bases and national laboratories.
My culture celebrates all the people, including the Navajo code talkers, who helped defeat the Nazis in World War II. It also honors the Pueblo revolt of 1680, when our indigenous ancestors fought back against their European oppressors.
We cheer for expansions of voting rights and civil rights. We recognize that the land we’re on was stolen from others. We work, imperfectly but with purpose, to try to right past wrongs and find ways forward together.
We’ll fight this racist purge
It would be a lie to portray New Mexico’s racial history as rainbows and unicorns. In fact, we have what we call the tri-cultural myth, perpetuated in the salute to our state flag and elsewhere, of “perfect friendship among united cultures.”
But New Mexico has a stronger history of working to learn from our mistakes and make amends than most of the United States.
Our Spanish ancestors did less harm to the indigenous people they encountered than their British and American counterparts. As a result, many Native tribes retain possession of at least parts of their ancestral homelands in New Mexico. That isn’t true across most of the continent.
And while the story of the Zia Symbol becoming New Mexico’s state flag begins with a theft, it is also a tale of good intentions. That’s more than we can say about the United States’ history of forced removal and killing that our federal government is celebrating — and that it’s repeating — in 2025.
As leaders in places like Albuquerque and New Mexico State University demonstrate, our state will fight this racist purge. We won’t bow before these Neo-Nazis.


Thank you for addressing the blatant and virulent racism that is foundational to the Trump regime and its MAGA base. It threatens us all.
It really does.
We have moved past mere observation or even trying to pick up the pieces now littering our democracy, or Constitutional republic lest I rankle the sensibilities of those who are offended by the word “democracy.” Definitely woke. No, we are in full destroy, replace, and deport mode with no moral or constitutional guardrails to protect the nation. The latest “sanitize the Smithsonian” edict might even have been too much for 1930’s Germany. So what can one do? The options may be narrowing. In the meantime, Epstein looms over an administration furiously attempting to best yesterday’s most outrageous act or comment.
Yeah, it’s really bad. Understatement, I know.
You mischaracterize the Trump Administration’s immigration policies, which they view as prioritizing national security and rule of law. They could assert that mass deportation efforts target illegal immigration to protect American jobs and communities, not to promote racism. The accusation of Nazi-coded messaging should be dismissed as hyperbolic, I point to the need for strong border enforcement as a practical response to immigration challenges, not a reflection of extremist ideology. I can’t agree with he inflammatory language you use I , argui it polarizes discourse and you ignore the complexity of immigration issues. In New Mexico, I would emphasize local economic concerns, like job competition, over call to reject deportation policies, while acknowledging the state’s diverse communities but framing border security as a shared interest. However, i might concede that messaging should avoid alienating minority groups to maintain broad support, advocating for clear, policy-focused communication rather than divisive rhetoric.
Hi Joe, it’s not me using Nazi-coded messaging. It’s the Trump Administration. If they don’t want to be accused of speaking like Nazis… they should stop speaking like Nazis. Then we could talk about the issues. As it stands, they’re speaking and acting like Nazis, and, frankly, gloating about it.
Here’s a quick story in answer to your column. Please read and comment
The desert air was cool as Tom, a small-town mechanic in Las Cruces, New Mexico, scrolled through X on his lunch break, his pickup parked outside his shop. Posts about the Trump Administration’s deportation efforts were everywhere, and the comments from liberal users stung. One called the policies a “fascist fever dream” shredding the Constitution, another labeled them outright racist, echoing Heath Haussamen’s latest column in the local haussamen.com. Tom, a conservative who’d voted for Trump, felt the accusations didn’t add up. He’d seen enough of border-town life to know immigration wasn’t a simple issue, and he wasn’t buying the narrative that enforcing the law was about hate.
Tom had read Haussamen’s piece, which claimed the Trump Administration was using Nazi-coded messaging to push mass deportations, targeting communities in New Mexico with racist intent. To Tom, this felt like a leap. He’d lived near the border his whole life, and the folks he knew—Hispanic, Anglo, Native—wanted the same thing: a system that worked. The liberal comments online, like those calling ICE raids “terrorizing,” seemed to ignore the chaos he’d seen from unchecked illegal immigration: strained schools, packed clinics, and local wages stuck in the mud. A 2025 report from the Center for Immigration Studies noted that illegal immigration cost New Mexico taxpayers $150 million annually for public services. To Tom, enforcing immigration laws wasn’t about race—it was about fairness and protecting his community’s resources.
He thought about his buddy Miguel, a legal immigrant who’d spent years navigating the system to become a citizen. Miguel supported deportations, especially for those with criminal records. A New York Times/Ipsos poll from January 2025 showed 88% of Americans, including majorities of Democrats, backed deporting illegal immigrants with criminal histories. Tom figured Haussamen and the X commenters were glossing over that consensus, painting every deportation as an attack on all immigrants. Sure, the administration’s rhetoric could be blunt—Tom winced at some of the “invasion” talk—but he saw it as a reaction to years of lax enforcement under Biden, when border crossings hit record highs, per CBP data.
The liberal posts on X also raged about ICE tactics, calling out masked agents and military-style raids as authoritarian. Tom got the concern; he’d heard about the Los Angeles raids in June 2025, where ICE swept up workers at Home Depots and doughnut shops, some without criminal records. A PBS News/NPR/Marist poll from July 2025 showed 54% of Americans thought ICE had gone “too far.” Tom didn’t love the optics either—agents should wear clear uniforms, he thought, and focus on criminals first, like Trump’s border czar Tom Homan promised at the Heritage Policy Fest. But he also knew ICE faced real dangers; his cousin, an ICE officer, had been pelted with bottles during a protest. ICE’s use of pepper spray, which you’d asked about before, was standard for crowd control when things got heated, and Tom saw it as necessary to keep order, not a sign of tyranny.
What frustrated Tom most was the accusation of racism. Haussamen’s column pointed to New Mexico’s diverse communities as a reason to resist, but Tom saw that diversity as exactly why the state needed strong enforcement. His Hispanic neighbors, many second-generation Americans, often complained about illegal immigration undercutting their businesses. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus might call deportations “destabilizing,” but Tom wondered if they’d checked with workers like his friend Maria, who lost contracts because undocumented laborers bid lower. The economic hit was real—economists warned mass deportations could spike inflation, but Tom figured keeping illegal labor out would protect local wages in the long run.
As he finished his sandwich, Tom tapped out a reply to one X post: “Calling everything racist shuts down the real talk. We need borders, laws, and jobs for citizens first. New Mexico’s diverse, but that doesn’t mean open season for illegal entry.” He hit send, knowing it’d probably get buried under a wave of replies. Still, he hoped the administration would tighten its focus—go after criminals, secure the border, and ease up on the heavy rhetoric. Haussamen’s call to resist felt like a rallying cry for chaos, not a solution. For Tom, conservatism meant sticking to the law, protecting the community, and keeping the economy fair for everyone who played by the rules
Thanks for your comment, Jefferson. I agree that immigration isn’t a simple issue, at all. I’ve been writing about it for 20 years. I also want a system that works. I hoped for comprehensive immigration reform when Bush proposed it, but it died, and I hoped again when Biden proposed what was essentially the Republican plan, and Trump ordered it killed because he didn’t want immigration solved; he wanted it to remain a campaign issue, so it died again.
Frankly, the most severe lawbreaking here is coming from the Trump Administration itself, which has flung off checks and balances and is acting as it pleases, often in defiance of court orders that were issued because it broke the law. Trump kept us from passing reform last year, and now he’s acting lawlessly — which is no surprise given that he’s a convicted felon.
As for me calling this racism — I don’t call “everything” racist — but this is way out of bounds. DHS is so blatantly using Nazi-coded language that even Grok sees it. They are putting out a call to actual Neo-Nazis and white supremacists to come work for DHS. “Tom’s” finger-pointing at me is misplaced. His finger should be pointed at the Trump Administration’s employees who are activating Neo-Nazis.
Heath, good Response to Jefferson.
Thank you Jane!
While I deplore the use of art in the manner you depict, let me contribute a cautionary background story that might explain some of what I believe is white male backlash (although in the case I will detail, no such backlash occurs). In the last 20 or so years, there has been the trend in this country to characterize all non-POC or white folks as inherently racist & “privileged”—regardless of how & in what circumstances we were raised. It’s my belief that much of the pro-“white/male” rhetoric is in response to that overly broad indictment. There is absolutely no doubt that there are racists, & there are abuses, but we pale folk are not all inherently racists & abusers.
If you want to talk about “blatant & virulent racism”, consider what happened to my “white” husband, whose heritage, in fact, includes a Mexican grandmother & a Native American Grandfather, but whose personal code demands that he should be judged on his own merits—not his ancestors. After completing his PhD work at UNM, he applied for a museum job in Santa Fe, the requirements for which listed degrees in anthropology & archeology, as well as museum experience, & Spanish language skills—all of which he had. He also had degrees in history & Latin American Studies. Suffice it to say that he was over-qualified, but he attempted to get an application for the job, the listing was abruptly removed & he later learned that the position had been relisted & promptly given to a young woman who had no college degree, but had the “proper” ethnic & language credentials. He went on to have a satisfying teaching career at NMSU & still gets glowing letters from students nine years after retirement.
We were both astonished at the museum job’s hiring strategy that clearly shut out a qualified candidate of the wrong gender & wrong (apparent) ethnicity. I suspect that this is/was not an isolated incident, although I have not researched it yet. The museum clearly had no difficulty manipulating the hiring process to get to the right kind of applicant.
My questions to you, Heath, are: First, since you characterize the deportation of undocumented immigrants as a “racist purge”, do you, in reality, consider such immigration to be merely the recolonization of “stolen lands”? Second, do you believe in the “All white people” interpretation?
Hi Karen! You ask some really good questions…
First, I am not characterizing the deportation of immigrants who lack legal status as a racist purge. I do not believe the enforcement of immigration law itself is inherently racist. It’s the way they’re going about it — lawless, acting as thugs who are terrorizing citizens and non-citizens alike, violating all sorts of laws and using Nazi-coded messaging — that makes it racist. I hope that clears that up.
The answer to your second questions is more complicated for me. I believe white people, myself included, benefit from a system that was designed to make things easier for them and more difficult for everyone else. I believe that makes it difficult for us to see some things that other people see about the system because it’s designed to put them at a disadvantage. The system is structurally racist and white people benefit from it, but that doesn’t mean all white people are individually racist. There is a difference between individual racism and systemic racism.
The perspective issue is important. I similarly think that, in recent years, as women and people of color have gained more power, it’s been difficult for many of them to see the impact that has had on men, and particularly white men, and that’s part of why we’ve reached a crisis point for men and boys in this country.
While the American system was not designed to benefit women and people of color and still puts them at a disadvantage, that doesn’t mean individual people of color can’t be individually racist — but they do not overall benefit from the American system over white men.
There are exceptions of course, and you named one. I have some too. We live in a state that often breaks the rules, and I grew up in a microcosm in Santa Fe in the 1990s where white people were hammered hard. I’ve written about it before: https://nmpolitics.net/index/2016/11/my-commitment-in-donald-trumps-america/
Hope that helps. Happy to discuss further.
The Santa Fe nickname, “The City Different” is wholly appropriate. The threee years we lived there were “educational”, to say the least. The northern NM anti-Anglo sentiment is sometimes funny, too, however. We rented a home there from a fellow whose wife came from very old northern NM roots. One afternoon, the wife & her mom came on a “surprise inspection visit” & since Mark was in class, it was my job to “host” them. As I dutifully followed them up the front sidewalk, they proceeded to make some very ugly comments about me, my family, & my home decor—all in Spanish, evidently assuming that no one who looked like me could possibly understand what they were saying. They were totally unaware that I’d been studying Spanish since middle school & had seriously applied myself because of the significant numbers of patients who spoke only Spanish that I routinely had seen, starting in med school. However, I wasn’t about to get into a “pissing match” with my landlady & her mom, so I said nothing. Never, but never assume that someone “doesn’t speak your language”.
That said, I think every doc (& other provider) in NM needs to know Spanish. The direct communication is so much better than going through a translator!
But back to Santa Fe: where else can you enjoy paying three times what it costs in Las Cruces to fix a broken window & later that evening, listen to your neighbors drum in the solstice?
I hear you! Fortunately, my experiences with Santa Fe in recent years are much different — and better — than they were back then. For me, it was a hard place to be a teenager.
Growing up white in Oakland I could tell stories about being harassed as a representative of “whiteness”, and it sucked. But it was petty compared to the impacts on our neighbors of centuries of laws explicitly supporting discrimination, and the realities despite the law, like lynching. I grew up and went into a world that treated me better than POC; I’ve had the privilege of focusing on gender obstacles; Black women have both.
Thank you for sharing that experience. That sounds similar to how I experienced Santa Fe as a teen.